REFERENCE COMPARISON

Antminer S21 vs WhatsMiner M60

Compare a 200 TH/s Bitmain reference with the 160 TH/s M60 bin. The M60 uses derived power, so confirm wall measurements before comparing operating budgets.

Select up to four ASICs (2/4)

ASIC comparison at 100% uptime and 2% pool fee
MetricAntminer S21 ↗200 TH/s reference variantWhatsMiner M60 ↗160 TH/s reference variant
Hashrate200 TH/s160 TH/s
Wall power3,500.0 W3,184.0 W (derived)
Calculated efficiency17.50 J/TH19.90 J/TH
Electricity / day$6.72$6.11
Electricity / month$201.60$183.40
Gross revenue / day$8.01$6.41
Operating profit / day$1.13$0.17
Break-even electricity$0.0935/kWh$0.0822/kWh
Heat output11,942 BTU/h10,864 BTU/h
Your hardware quote ($)

Calculated differences

Each selected ASIC is compared with the first column. USD differences use your current tariff.

Antminer S21 vs WhatsMiner M60

  • Antminer S21 provides 40 more TH/s than WhatsMiner M60.
  • Antminer S21 uses 316 more watts than WhatsMiner M60.
  • Antminer S21 produces 1,078.24 more BTU/hour than WhatsMiner M60.
  • Antminer S21 costs 0.61 more USD/day than WhatsMiner M60.
  • Antminer S21 costs 18.2 more USD/month than WhatsMiner M60.

Source: listed manufacturer references, derived power where noted, and current user inputs. Last updated: on each input change. Hardware quotes are user supplied, not market prices. Assumes current network conditions remain constant.

Network last updated: 2026-09-29T13:32:04.000Z. Source: mempool.space — BTC/USD price, mempool.space — estimated network hashrate and current difficulty, mempool.space — mean fees of latest 10 confirmed blocks; subsidy derived from next height.

Antminer S21: what changes?

200 TH/s reference. Lower hashrate bins also exist; select the figures on your unit label.

The reference uses 3,500.0 W. The table and mathematical differences above use your selected tariff, so all displayed comparison costs update together.

Inspect specifications, source and calculator →

WhatsMiner M60: what changes?

160 TH/s shop listing. Power is derived from listed hashrate × efficiency; it is not a separately verified wall-power specification.

The reference uses 3,184.0 W. The table and mathematical differences above use your selected tariff, so all displayed comparison costs update together.

Inspect specifications, source and calculator →

How to interpret this comparison

Lower J/TH means less electrical energy per unit of hashing work. It does not account for purchase price, installation, noise, cooling infrastructure or resale value. Enter comparable hardware quotes and inspect the exact bin before using an estimate in a budget.

Evaluate simple payback or include hosting charges.

Related ASIC references

Related calculators

Curated comparisons