Compare the S19 XP 240-Ca 141 TH/s reference with the 200 TH/s S21. Quantify the change in hashrate, daily energy and thermal load before adding your hardware quote.
Each selected ASIC is compared with the first column. USD differences use your current tariff.
Antminer S19 XP vs Antminer S21
Antminer S19 XP provides 59 fewer TH/s than Antminer S21.
Antminer S19 XP uses 468.5 fewer watts than Antminer S21.
Antminer S19 XP produces 1,598.59 fewer BTU/hour than Antminer S21.
Antminer S19 XP costs 0.9 fewer USD/day than Antminer S21.
Antminer S19 XP costs 26.99 fewer USD/month than Antminer S21.
Source: listed manufacturer references, derived power where noted, and current user inputs. Last updated: on each input change. Hardware quotes are user supplied, not market prices. Assumes current network conditions remain constant.
Network last updated: 2026-09-29T12:09:54.000Z. Source: mempool.space — BTC/USD price, mempool.space — estimated network hashrate and current difficulty, mempool.space — mean fees of latest 10 confirmed blocks; subsidy derived from next height.
Antminer S19 XP: what changes?
141 TH/s, model 240-Ca from the official support sheet. Do not mix these values with a 140 TH/s batch.
The reference uses 3,031.5 W. The table and mathematical differences above use your selected tariff, so all displayed comparison costs update together.
200 TH/s reference. Lower hashrate bins also exist; select the figures on your unit label.
The reference uses 3,500.0 W. The table and mathematical differences above use your selected tariff, so all displayed comparison costs update together.
Lower J/TH means less electrical energy per unit of hashing work. It does not account for purchase price, installation, noise, cooling infrastructure or resale value. Enter comparable hardware quotes and inspect the exact bin before using an estimate in a budget.